WORKING PAPER
Who Pays for Higher Energy Prices? Distributional Effects in the Housing Market (2025)
with Francisco Amaral
We examine how rising energy costs affect rental housing markets and inequality. Using listing data for the 30 largest German cities from 2015–2024, we find that higher energy prices are passed through to net rents in high-rent segments, where inefficient properties see significant rent reductions, but not in lower-priced segments. This asymmetry reflects tighter markets and lower demand elasticity in the affordable segment. Consequently, low-income households face much larger increases in total housing costs. Our results show how segmented housing markets can amplify inequality when energy prices rise, highlighting important distributional implications for climate policy.
Beyond Interest Rates: Upfront Costs and Housing Affordability in Germany (2025)
with Francisco Amaral, Gereon Staratschek, and Jonas Zdrzalek
Housing (un-)affordability has become a defining social and economic challenge in German cities, shaping both wealth accumulation and intergenerational inequality. We decompose affordability into two components: the ability to service monthly mortgage payments and the ability to meet the upfront cash requirements for purchasing a home. Combining data on re-gional mortgage financing conditions, household incomes, and house prices from 1980 to 2024, we find that mortgage payments relative to income have changed little over time. In stark contrast, upfront costs relative to income have risen sharply: whereas households in 1980–1990 needed savings of less than two years of annual income to cover the equity re-quirement for an apartment purchase, households in 2015–2024 require more than three years. These results show that focusing on mortgage costs alone severely understates the decline in housing affordability. Instead, rising entry costs have become the primary constraint on homeownership, reinforcing advantages for households with existing wealth or familial finan-cial support.
Kiel Working Paper, Kiel Policy Brief
Media coverage: Zeit, tagesschau
WORK IN PROGRESS
Statutory incidence matters: Evidence from a policy intervention in the German housing market
with Jörg Claussen, David J. Streich, and Katerina Vlieg
Liability-side equivalence predicts that the statutory incidence of a tax or fee does not affect its economic incidence, but empirical tests have thus far relied on laboratory studies as identification is challenging in broad real-world reforms. To study liabilityside equivalence using field data, we exploit a German policy intervention that shifted the statutory incidence of real estate agent fees from property buyers to sellers. We use more than 600,000 property listings and employ a difference-in-differences estimation exploiting object-level susceptibility to the intervention. Contrary to economic theory, we find that key market outcomes are affected by the shift in statutory incidence. Specifically, sellers do not pass on the statutory burden through higher prices and instead reduce demand for brokerage. Intuitively, the decrease in demand is highest when brokers are expensive and offer little benefit. Using micro-level transaction data from seven tight housing markets, we show that off-platform negotiations do not rectify liability-side equivalence. Our results challenge the notion that statutory incidence is irrelevant for the distribution of economic incidence.
Monetary Policy, House Prices, and Regional Discount Rates
with Francisco Amaral, Martin Kornejew, and Jonas Zdrzalek
This paper investigates the heterogeneous impact of monetary policy on house prices across geographical regions. We document substantial spatial heterogeneity in the sensitivity of house prices to monetary policy shocks. In large superstar agglomerations with low rental yields, prices decline (rise) more strongly in response to contractionary (expansionary) monetary policy compared to peripheral regions. We propose a mechanism based on pre-existing differences in regional discount rates for real estate assets.
Time-varying Capital Requirements and Credit Supply
This paper provides evidence on the effect of time-varying capital requirements on credit supply by answering the following two questions: First, do banks increase their credit supply by lowering the minimum capital requirement only temporarily with an announced exception period? And second, what is the effect of this policy on bank’s risk-taking and equity and thus on the stability of banks? To answer these questions, I estimate the effect of the temporary reduction in the Community Bank Leverage Ratio (CBLR) requirement on credit supply in the U.S. during the Covid-19 pandemic. The findings indicate that poorly capitalized banks with a lower leverage ratio exhibit a greater increase in lending and risk-taking following the temporary CBLR reduction compared to their well-capitalized counterparts. Additionally, the results suggest that exposed banks enhance their equity through retained earnings. This underscores that the trade-off associated with time-varying capital requirements, balancing the stability of banks against stimulating credit supply by lowering minimum capital standards, may be constrained in duration, yet still effectively boost lending. These results hold significance from a policy perspective, offering policymakers an additional tool to foster credit supply in times of crisis.
REPORTS
Green Signals: Energy Efficiency and German Housing Markets (2024)
with Francisco Amaral, Morgane Soufflet, and Jonas Zdrzalek
This study examines the impact of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) on sales prices and rents using millions of real estate listings in Germany to address the stagnation in refurbishment rates. Higher energy efficiency leads to higher prices and rents, with larger premiums for properties rated using the Bedarfsausweis (based on expert’s evaluation) compared to the Verbrauchsausweis (based on past meter readings). Rent premiums reflect energy cost savings only with the Bedarfsausweis, suggesting that accurate information enables market participants to internalize savings. While refurbishment is financially viable with the Bedarfsausweis, many listings omit EPC information, highlighting the need for stricter enforcement. Policy recommendations: prioritize the Bedarfsausweis, phase out the Verbrauchsausweis, and implement sanctions to improve compliance.
Media coverage: Zeit, Handelsblatt, WirtschaftsWoche, Spiegel, ZDF, tagesschau, ntv
Podcasts: IMMOblick
Öffentliche Investitionen und Fiskalregeln im Tiefzinsumfeld (2021)
with Lars P. Feld, Christoph A. Schaltegger, Yannick Bury, Philipp Weber and Laura Zell
This economic study examines the impact of the low-interest rates environment on public investments in Swiss municipalities and cantons from 2009 to 2018. The analysis reveals a consistent decline in borrowing costs for municipalities and cantons over the decade, while average gross investment expenditures slightly decreased at the cantonal level. However, for cantons with strict fiscal rules, there was a notable increase between 2015 and 2017. We observe a negative correlation between borrowing costs and public investment spending, especially in the construction and public education sectors for both federal tiers. In a difference-in-differences analysis, we find that cantons with particularly strict fiscal rules significantly increased their public investments following an unexpected interest rate cut on 15 January 2015, indicating that strict fiscal rules did not hinder these cantons from capitalizing on the reduced interest rates.
PHILOSOPHY
The Common Good A Priori in Pluralistic Democracies: An Attempt to Synthesize Ernst Fraenkel’s Theory of Pluralistic Democracies with Immanuel Kant’s Practical Philosophy (2020)
– In German only –
This study delves into the dichotomy between a priori and a posteriori conceptions of the common good, as identified by Ernst Fraenkel in the context of pluralistic democracy. While a posteriori common good is empirically derived from individual interests, the a priori variant is posited as an inherent, non-experiential quality. Contrary to the perceived incompatibility, the thesis contends that even in pluralistic democracy, an a priori common good is crucial for system legitimacy, necessitating a synthesis of these perspectives. The controversial nature of an a priori common good, characterized by its independence from individual interests, is addressed through Kantian practical philosophy, grounding the common will in reason. This study aligns with Fraenkel’s emphasis on a rule-of-law state in pluralistic democracy, proposing a complementary role for Kantian practical philosophy. Recognizing the limitations of a formal a priori common good, the study highlights the need for a political process to determine specific content, emphasizing the importance of upholding the formal requirement of legality for legitimacy in pluralistic democracy. The synthesis of a priori and a posteriori common goods is explored through a hierarchical abstraction, illustrating their interdependence in achieving a comprehensive understanding of the common good in pluralistic democracy.